Asrock Z270 Pro4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	98.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock Z270 Pro4 (all builds)
Memory	2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170213
Uptime	21.3 Days
Run Date	Oct 09 '21 at 23:38
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	44%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	72.1% Very good	Memory 74.5 1-Core 121 2-Core 212 76% 136 Pts	4-Core 390 8-Core 468 56% 429 Pts	64-Core 447 28% 447 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% MSI(1462 3367) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	98.5% Outstanding	Lighting 127 Reflection 114 Parallax 115 104% 119 fps	MRender 106 Gravity 129 Splatting 94.6 88% 110 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 98.5% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 51GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1558 Write 1,203 Mixed 500 239% 1,087 MB/s	4K Read 36.1 4K Write 88.9 4K Mixed 44.3 158% 56.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1,060 DQ Write 668 DQ Mixed 636 536% 788 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 12GB free Firmware: RVT01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 428 Write 410 Mixed 382 91% 407 MB/s	4K Read 32.2 4K Write 87.8 4K Mixed 42.3 150% 54.1 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 337 DQ Mixed 356 268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
SanDisk Cruzer Spark 16GB 1,145 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 4GB free, PID 55a1 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 5.7 5.4 5.7 5.4 5.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	5.53% Terrible	Read 15.2 Write 4.7 Mixed 10 SusWrite 5.7 11% 8.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.6 47% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 5.53% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial Ballistix Sport LT DDR4 2400 C16 1x8GB-$25 20,263 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	32.6% Below average	MC Read 12.1 MC Write 11.1 MC Mixed 9.7 31% 11 GB/s	SC Read 9.3 SC Write 10.4 SC Mixed 9.1 27% 9.6 GB/s	Latency 91.4 44% 91.4 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 32.6% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z270 Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,374 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 71%

Battleship

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 61%

Destroyer

Motherboard: Asrock Z270 Pro4 - $176

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	549x
Core i5-7600KIntel $190Bench 76%, 195,006 samples	274x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	108x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	189x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	163x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	159x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	47x
Green 240GB (2016)WDBench 53%, 20,831 samples	33x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	31x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	51x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	51x
DDR4 2400 2OZ 2x8GBUnknownBench 72%, 21,822 samples	47x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $683

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16