PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 56.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 79.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Supermicro PIO-617R-TLN4F+-ST031 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Supermicro X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+ |
Memory | 119.5 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20191120 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Oct 02 '21 at 23:38 |
Run Duration | 168 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 14% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
|
69.4%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3829 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.09
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
56.4%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39
237GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X31200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 324 213 214 210 208 MB/s
|
79.7%
Very good
|
|||
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$194
251GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 110 110 110 110 111 MB/s
|
71.3%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M393B1K70DH0-YH9 16x8GB
16 of 24 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
70.8%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
8% | 50% | 4 | 7 | 5 | 60 | 34.1" | 1280 720 | GSM59F2 LG ULTRAWIDE |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2637 v21stBench 73%, 400 samples | 9x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 01stBench 60%, 1,235 samples | 7x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 01stBench 59%, 1,097 samples | 3x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 9x |
RTX 3060Nvidia $250Bench 100%, 447,556 samples | 7x |
GTX 1070-TiNvidia $299Bench 94%, 412,133 samples | 3x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 65% - Good | Total price: $528 |