EVGA 132-YW-E180-FTW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.62% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive32.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemEVGA__ 132-YW-E180-FTW
MotherboardEVGA 132-YW-E180-FTW  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080915
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 11 '17 at 16:27
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550-$161
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
49.7% Average
Memory 83.5
1-Core 28.3
2-Core 55.2
40% 55.7 Pts
4-Core 94.4
8-Core 102
13% 98.4 Pts
64-Core 106
6% 106 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9800 GT
EVGA(3842 C975) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.92
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
6.62% Terrible
Lighting 8.93
Reflection 8.73
Parallax 2.91
7% 6.86 fps
MRender 7.62
Gravity 6.63
Splatting 5.74
5% 6.66 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.62%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 240GB-$139
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 400i
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.1% Below average
Read 126
Write 89.1
Mixed 109
24% 108 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 32.4
4K Mixed 13
66% 22.2 MB/s
DQ Read 45.8
DQ Write 50.5
DQ Mixed 22.6
24% 39.6 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 95%
Intel SS DSA2MH080G1G 80GB
45GB free
Firmware: 045C
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
76.9% Very good
Read 227
Write 39.7
Mixed 53.5
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 4.12
4K Write 3.06
4K Mixed 1.74
422% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DRAM
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
MC Read 6.8
MC Write 5.4
MC Mixed 5.3
17% 5.83 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 5
14% 4.9 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 132-YW-E180-FTW Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: EVGA 132-YW-E180-FTW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $170
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback