Asus ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive37.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory21.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 28 '21 at 22:10
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 67%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7800X-$206
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 72.4
1-Core 132
2-Core 258
83% 154 Pts
4-Core 387
8-Core 638
62% 512 Pts
64-Core 923
57% 923 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 61 53 50 50 49 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.2% Below average
Read 169
Write 78.2
Mixed 105
SusWrite 55.6
23% 102 MB/s
4K Read 9.6
4K Write 40.5
4K Mixed 16.5
57% 22.2 MB/s
DQ Read 360
DQ Write 60.4
DQ Mixed 90.6
97% 170 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 283%
Corsair Force GT 120GB-$155
19GB free
Firmware: 5.24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 132 120 118 130 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 381
Write 201
Mixed 245
SusWrite 125
53% 238 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 77.2
4K Mixed 40.2
135% 48.6 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 185
142% 193 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 83%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 5TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 418 394 300 291 306 245 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Read 379
Write 352
Mixed 353
SusWrite 326
79% 352 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 51.1
4K Mixed 29.2
95% 33.4 MB/s
DQ Read 439
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 325
258% 361 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 115%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 4TB
163GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 91 104 90 107 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 94
Write 88.9
Mixed 81.2
SusWrite 90.7
66% 88.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK16GX4M4B3000C15 CMK16GX4M4B3000C15 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK16GX4M4B3000C15 CMK16GX4M4B3000C15 32GB
2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
90% Outstanding
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 58
MC Mixed 28.2
104% 36.3 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 9.5
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 96
42% 96 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 90%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 10 8 60 0" 1280 720
Typical ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING Builds (Compare 1,739 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING - $275

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $1,341
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback