PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 31.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 98.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Gigabyte Z97X-SLI |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-Z97X-SLI-CF (all builds) |
Memory | 9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20140425 |
Uptime | 5.2 Days |
Run Date | Aug 28 '21 at 14:40 |
Run Duration | 141 Seconds |
Run User | SVN-User |
Background CPU | 61% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
72.1%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 280X-$500
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
31.5%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
582GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 403 412 422 433 429 432 MB/s
|
98.2%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
400GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 119 119 121 121 121 MB/s
|
76.4%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown CT51264BD160B.C16F 1315 BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 1315 CT51264BD160B.C16F 1315 BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
50.5%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 12 | 10 | 144 | 24" | 1280 720 | AOC246A 2460G4 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples | 705x |
Core i5-4690KIntel $53Bench 70%, 229,359 samples | 471x |
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 212x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 269x |
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 126x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 115x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 60% - Above average | Total price: $648 |