Fujitsu G31T-M2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	6.67% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Fujitsu G31T-M2 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU G31T-M2
Memory	2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20070907
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 07 '17 at 10:32
Run Duration	607 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100 59,658 User benchmarks, average bench 42% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	47% Average	Memory 75.7 1-Core 27.9 2-Core 55.4 38% 53 Pts	4-Core 108 8-Core 111 15% 110 Pts	64-Core 107 7% 107 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6670 32,193 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Sapphire(174B E195) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	6.67% Terrible	Lighting 8.17 Reflection 7.77 Parallax 5.41 7% 7.11 fps	MRender 8.67 Gravity 6.5 Splatting 9.04 7% 8.07 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.67% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 436GB free (System drive) Firmware: JC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 97 217367796 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2129 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 87 60 508868147 (09) Power-on hours count 81 81 17154 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2095 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 118 (BC) Unknown 100 91 197571510366 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 55 606273572 (C2) HDA temperature 36 45 55834574884 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 44 30 217367796 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 160 30080 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -99888054380797 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1062706460 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3902841630	53.8% Above average	Read 88 Write 99.5 Mixed 29.5 53% 72.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.48 4K Mixed 0.37 88% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 68%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB 1,694 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 435GB free, PID a202 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	16.7% Very poor	Read 34.4 Write 29.4 Mixed 31.5 40% 31.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.21 66% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 16.7% Great: 44%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB 34,316 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 8GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	6.2% Terrible	Read 20.7 Write 5.17 Mixed 7.08 11% 11 MB/s	4K Read 3.82 4K Write 0.38 4K Mixed 1.16 66% 1.79 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.2% Great: 18%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB 34,316 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 4GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	6.13% Terrible	Read 20.6 Write 5.29 Mixed 7.81 12% 11.2 MB/s	4K Read 3.56 4K Write 0.37 4K Mixed 0.84 54% 1.59 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.13% Great: 18%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB 34,316 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 2GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	8.15% Terrible	Read 21.3 Write 5.49 Mixed 8.48 12% 11.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.17 4K Write 0.94 4K Mixed 1.32 92% 2.14 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 8.15% Great: 18%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1GB free, PID 0211 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	11% Very poor	Read 21.1 Write 21.6 Mixed 21.1 28% 21.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.21 4K Write 1.03 4K Mixed 0.13 40% 0.46 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM SDRAM Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	17.6% Very poor	MC Read 6.8 MC Write 4.5 MC Mixed 4.8 15% 5.37 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 4.8 13% 4.4 GB/s	Latency 88.8 45% 88.8 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G31T-M2 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 38%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu G31T-M2

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	4x
Core2 Duo E4500Intel $130Bench 33%, 8,675 samples	2x
Pentium Dual E2140Intel $80Bench 31%, 2,489 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	2x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	1x
GeForce 8600 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 8,099 samples	1x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	1x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	1x
SSD 64GBSanDisk $56Bench 38%, 3,862 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	5x
1x2GBUnknownBench 17%, 99,586 samples	2x
3GBUnknownBench 14%, 81,553 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $128

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16