bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics6.34% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System
MotherboardIntel D945GCL
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20070905
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 14 '16 at 05:42
Run Duration381 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 6300-$40
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.85 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
30.3% Below average
Memory 54.7
1-Core 17.8
2-Core 39.3
27% 37.3 Pts
4-Core 39.1
8-Core 31.7
5% 35.4 Pts
64-Core 38.3
2% 38.3 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6670
Sapphire(174B E195) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
6.34% Terrible
Lighting 7.73
Reflection 7.23
Parallax 5.16
6% 6.71 fps
MRender 8.38
Gravity 6.17
Splatting 8.7
6% 7.75 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.34%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
482GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 83
Write 86.5
Mixed 79.5
62% 83 MB/s
4K Read 0.78
4K Write 1.47
4K Mixed 0.44
109% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 68%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 64GB
2GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
8.06% Terrible
Read 18.3
Write 10.2
Mixed 8.18
14% 12.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.26
4K Write 0.79
4K Mixed 0.65
61% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.06%
Great: 18%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB
2GB free, PID 0211
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Read 19.4
Write 19.7
Mixed 19.5
25% 19.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.23
4K Write 1.23
4K Mixed 0.15
48% 0.54 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
MC Read 2.9
MC Write 3.3
MC Mixed 2.5
8% 2.9 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 2.4
9% 3.3 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,440 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback