MSI P67A-C45 (MS-7673)

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	14.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	87.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	MSI MS-7673
Motherboard	MSI P67A-C45 (MS-7673) (all builds)
Memory	13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111004
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 11 '21 at 18:20
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	72.5% Very good	Memory 84.1 1-Core 91.4 2-Core 182 69% 119 Pts	4-Core 354 8-Core 351 47% 352 Pts	64-Core 349 22% 349 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Asus(1043 85F5) 2GB CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.68 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	14.6% Very poor	Lighting 18.1 Reflection 18.5 Parallax 18.8 15% 18.5 fps	MRender 15.8 Gravity 19.3 Splatting 17.1 14% 17.4 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 823GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 347 356 363 361 363 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	87.1% Excellent	Read 387 Write 383 Mixed 326 SusWrite 345 81% 360 MB/s	4K Read 36.3 4K Write 67.4 4K Mixed 46.2 150% 50 MB/s	DQ Read 44.6 DQ Write 113 DQ Mixed 59 51% 72.2 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 87.1% Great: 133%
59 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 2GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 4.2 3.8 4.1 4.1 4.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	1.91% Terrible	Read 5.7 Write 4 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 3.9 6% 4.45 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 4% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.91% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-10666CL7-4GBXH F3-10666CL7-4GBXH F3-10666CL7-4GBXH F3-10666CL7-4GBXH 16GB 69 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	51.3% Above average	MC Read 17.9 MC Write 19 MC Mixed 16.3 51% 17.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 15.5 44% 15.3 GB/s	Latency 73.3 55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 51.3% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	27"	1280 720	AOC2701 Q27P1B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P67A-C45 (MS-7673) Builds (Compare 358 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: MSI P67A-C45 (MS-7673)

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	185x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	38x
Core i7-2600Intel $187Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	29x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	44x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	26x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	24x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	12x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	11x

RAM
CMX8GX3M2B1600C9 CMX8GX3M2B1600C9 8GBCorsairBench 51%, 137 samples	9x
CML16GX3M2A1600C10 CML16GX3M2A1600C10 16GBCorsairBench 48%, 91 samples	8x
KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C10D3/8G 16GBKingstonBench 50%, 248 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $474

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $250	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16