Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	15.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	185% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200728
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Jul 18 '21 at 11:57
Run Duration	422 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135 127,344 User benchmarks, average bench 63% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	70.9% Very good	Memory 74.9 1-Core 118 2-Core 212 76% 135 Pts	4-Core 360 8-Core 624 60% 492 Pts	64-Core 597 37% 597 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega 11 (Ryzen iGPU) 44,235 User benchmarks, average bench 15% Asus(1043 876B) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.45.36 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	15.8% Very poor	Lighting 20.9 Reflection 15.2 Parallax 32 17% 22.7 fps	MRender 12 Gravity 23.4 Splatting 14.1 13% 16.5 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 15.8% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 480GB 36,473 User benchmarks, average bench 198% 405GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFM12.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1223 554 588 596 579 580 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	185% Outstanding	Read 1,462 Write 1,890 Mixed 1414 SusWrite 686 307% 1363 MB/s	4K Read 37.8 4K Write 89.8 4K Mixed 51.1 170% 59.6 MB/s	DQ Read 874 DQ Write 564 DQ Mixed 763 557% 734 MB/s
Poor: 125% ↑ This bench: 185% Great: 262%
Intenso Sata III 256GB 2,573 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 238GB free Firmware: S0813A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 387 384 386 385 386 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	91.3% Outstanding	Read 490 Write 425 Mixed 373 SusWrite 386 94% 418 MB/s	4K Read 28.6 4K Write 78.7 4K Mixed 29.7 123% 45.7 MB/s	DQ Read 153 DQ Write 336 DQ Mixed 48.5 93% 179 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 91.3% Great: 95%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 244GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 60 65 66 66 66 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	46.8% Average	Read 99.1 Write 86 Mixed 29.9 SusWrite 64.3 51% 69.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.3 66% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 242GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 89 92 94 92 92 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	55.1% Above average	Read 101 Write 99.4 Mixed 49.6 SusWrite 91.7 62% 85.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.7 123% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 84%
WD Re 4TB (2012)-$70 4,260 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 251GB free Firmware: 01.01K03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 91 94 94 95 95 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	56.3% Above average	Read 102 Write 96.6 Mixed 56.5 SusWrite 93.3 64% 87.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 1 204% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 96%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 241GB free Firmware: CC25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 175 178 179 179 178 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	93.3% Outstanding	Read 148 Write 144 Mixed 79.5 SusWrite 178 100% 137 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 93.3% Great: 114%
Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB-$100 19,960 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 248GB free Firmware: CC34 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 60 65 66 69 69 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	37.8% Below average	Read 65.8 Write 55.9 Mixed 40.6 SusWrite 65.5 42% 57 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.9 157% 1 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 61%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 3TB free Firmware: CC52 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 78 79 79 78 76 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	61.8% Good	Read 137 Write 147 Mixed 72.7 SusWrite 78.5 80% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 61.8% Great: 96%
Covecube Virtual Disk 2TB 1,262 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 7.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 47 49 47 46 52 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 25% Great: 105%
ST3000DM 001-9YN166 3TB 36 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 326GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 113 111 117 113 116 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	45.7% Average	Read 120 Write 123 Mixed 89 SusWrite 114 151% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 64% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 68%
WDC WD20 EURS-63SPKY0 2TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 236GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 109 110 103 105 109 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	41.8% Average	Read 122 Write 126 Mixed 48.3 SusWrite 104 132% 100 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 30% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 47%
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB 61 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 240GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 109 110 103 105 109 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	33.2% Below average	Read 56.3 Write 70.4 Mixed 38.7 SusWrite 103 95% 67.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.5 46% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 54%
ST8000AS 0002-1NA17Z 8TB 115 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 403GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	47.9% Average	Read 101 Write 146 Mixed 79.2 SusWrite 0 107% 81.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 10.8 4K Mixed 0.8 396% 4 MB/s	DQ Read 0.4 DQ Write 9.2 DQ Mixed 0.9 345% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 92%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00D8PB0 2TB 77 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 234GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	20.2% Poor	Read 127 Write 127 Mixed 82.5 SusWrite 0.2 105% 84.2 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.6 41% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 20.2% Great: 59%
HGST HDN 728080ALE604 8TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0.2 0.1 0 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	30.8% Below average	Read 143 Write 152 Mixed 72.3 SusWrite 0.1 114% 91.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 0.9 143% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 48%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00DC0B0 2TB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 341GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	20.5% Poor	Read 129 Write 126 Mixed 88.2 SusWrite 0.4 108% 85.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.6 41% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 20.5% Great: 57%
ST4000DM 000-2AE166 4TB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 412GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	21% Poor	Read 110 Write 91.5 Mixed 66 SusWrite 0 82% 66.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 21% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$75 134,977 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	85.8% Excellent	MC Read 31.5 MC Write 32.7 MC Mixed 28 88% 30.7 GB/s	SC Read 22.9 SC Write 34.9 SC Mixed 25.5 79% 27.8 GB/s	Latency 90.6 44% 90.6 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 85.8% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	60	24"	1280 720	GSM56CC W2442

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,546 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	423x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	328x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	205x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	220x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	190x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	95x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	161x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	124x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $39Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	58x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $647

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)