Asus F1A55-M LE

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	75% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	27% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus F1A55-M LE (all builds)
Memory	5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110818
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 21 '21 at 18:25
Run Duration	275 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	17%

Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-3850 APU-$80 3,108 User benchmarks, average bench 46% FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	44.4% Average	Memory 60.2 1-Core 45.3 2-Core 91.3 41% 65.6 Pts	4-Core 168 8-Core 163 22% 166 Pts	64-Core 159 10% 159 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$240 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% EVGA(3842 1068) CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 4002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.77 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	75% Very good	Lighting 93.1 Reflection 92 Parallax 85.7 76% 90.3 fps	MRender 124 Gravity 81.2 Splatting 72.4 73% 92.4 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 75% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB 86,316 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 196GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF4500RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 79 29 2.7 60 82 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	27% Poor	Read 198 Write 160 Mixed 138 SusWrite 63.3 31% 140 MB/s	4K Read 13.4 4K Write 12.7 4K Mixed 14.4 46% 13.5 MB/s	DQ Read 17.7 DQ Write 23.5 DQ Mixed 19.1 15% 20.1 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 56%
Geek Squad 8GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 4GB free, PID 0030 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.5 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.7 6.5 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	5.77% Terrible	Read 21.7 Write 6.5 Mixed 6 SusWrite 6.6 11% 10.2 MB/s	4K Read 5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 18% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 5.77% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BLT4G3D1608DT2TXRG 8GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	32.5% Below average	MC Read 12.9 MC Write 12.1 MC Mixed 11 34% 12 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 7.7 19% 6.63 GB/s	Latency 127 31% 127 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 5: 1R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
5%	4%	25	106	5	60	31.5"	2560 1440	GBT3200 G32QC

History: Score 7: 0R 1G 4B | Score 21: 4R 0G 1B | Score 5: 1R 0G 0B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical F1A55-M LE Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A55-M LE

CPU
A6-3650 APUAMDBench 44%, 2,748 samples	8x
A6-3670 APUAMDBench 46%, 2,400 samples	6x
A8-3850 APUAMD $80Bench 46%, 3,108 samples	6x

GPU
Radeon HD 6530DAMDBench 3%, 4,675 samples	6x
Radeon HD 6410DAMDBench 2%, 3,128 samples	5x
Radeon HD 6550DAMDBench 4%, 4,197 samples	4x

SSD
MTFDDAK256MAY-1AH12ABHA 256GBCrucialBench 83%, 1,792 samples	2x
SSDPR-CL100-240-G2 240GBBench 68%, 1,204 samples	2x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x

RAM
M378B5173BH0-CK0 8GBSamsungBench 43%, 56 samples	2x
KHX1600C9D3/4GX 8GBKingstonBench 41%, 1,116 samples	2x
99U5471-012.A00LF 8GBKingstonBench 47%, 1,159 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16