Asus TUF B360M-E GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics97% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF B360M-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180910
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 31 '21 at 09:35
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 26%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$98
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
90% Excellent
Memory 91.8
1-Core 99.5
2-Core 248
81% 146 Pts
4-Core 479
8-Core 658
72% 569 Pts
64-Core 642
40% 642 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 90%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Nvidia(10DE 12FE) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.39
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97% Outstanding
Lighting 114
Reflection 111
Parallax 124
93% 117 fps
MRender 172
Gravity 120
Splatting 103
104% 132 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 97%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ccboot iSCSI 107GB
0GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 9.9 10 21 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Read 31.3
Write 35.8
Mixed 31.8
SusWrite 14.6
21% 28.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.8
127% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 55%
Ccboot iSCSI 8TB
0GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.9 12 16 12 12 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
4.04% Terrible
Read 2
Write 2.3
Mixed 3
SusWrite 12.1
4% 4.85 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.5
57% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.04%
Great: 39%
Ccboot iSCSI 512GB
0GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 29 30 29 32 29 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Read 24.8
Write 26.7
Mixed 26.3
SusWrite 28.7
20% 26.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
92% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB-$42
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
79.7% Very good
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 30.4
MC Mixed 24.1
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 25.3
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B360M-E GAMING Builds (Compare 1,110 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360M-E GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $214
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback