ADD TO PC
BUILD

Supermicro X9QR7-TF+/X9QRi-F+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	47.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	512GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 512GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Supermicro X9QR7-TF+/X9QRi-F+ (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro X9QR7-TF+/X9QRi-F+
Memory	498.4 GB free of 512 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150520
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 18 '17 at 18:09
Run Duration	266 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel 7 User benchmarks, average bench 66% SOCKET 0, 4 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	30.8% Below average	Memory 21.9 1-Core 40.2 2-Core 121 30% 61.2 Pts	4-Core 211 8-Core 499 41% 355 Pts	64-Core 1,706 106% 1,706 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 74%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$690 3,492 User benchmarks, average bench 271% 2TB free Firmware: 1B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	183% Outstanding	Read 1,155 Write 1,704 Mixed 1,445 323% 1,435 MB/s	4K Read 25.8 4K Write 37 4K Mixed 23.3 88% 28.7 MB/s	DQ Read 121 DQ Write 117 DQ Mixed 30 47% 89.4 MB/s
Poor: 162% ↑ This bench: 183% Great: 354%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$690 3,492 User benchmarks, average bench 271% 1.5TB free Firmware: 1B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	182% Outstanding	Read 1,346 Write 1,670 Mixed 1,510 339% 1,509 MB/s	4K Read 21.4 4K Write 30 4K Mixed 19.7 74% 23.7 MB/s	DQ Read 107 DQ Write 77.6 DQ Mixed 54.6 51% 79.8 MB/s
Poor: 162% ↑ This bench: 182% Great: 354%
Adaptec Array 1TB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 873GB free Firmware: V1.0 Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 27% Great: 107%
OCZ REVODRIVE3 X2 960GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 706GB free Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value
Poor: 63% Great: 94%
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200 31,545 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 403GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 6991 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 183 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 96 96 126 (AE) Unknown 100 100 90 (B4) Unknown 0 0 4403 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 80 38 266288103444 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 96 96 4 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 15031527007 (F7) Unknown 100 100 478921311 (F8) Unknown 100 100 3731424722	47.7% Average	Read 260 Write 254 Mixed 261 58% 258 MB/s	4K Read 15.7 4K Write 28.3 4K Mixed 17.4 61% 20.5 MB/s	DQ Read 61 DQ Write 67.6 DQ Mixed 34.2 34% 54.3 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 107%
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70 27,495 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 198GB free Firmware: 502ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 4733875 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 -25305947270073 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 73 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 68 (B1) Unknown 0 0 17 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 22 84 77314916374 (C2) HDA temperature 22 84 77314916374 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 4733875 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 4733875 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 4733875 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 99 99 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 27629 (EA) Unknown 0 0 18436 (F1) Unknown 0 0 18436 (F2) Unknown 0 0 2332	59.6% Above average	Read 477 Write 264 Mixed 317 78% 353 MB/s	4K Read 16.7 4K Write 35.8 4K Mixed 10.4 58% 21 MB/s	DQ Read 220 DQ Write 117 DQ Mixed 56.8 72% 131 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 94%
Adaptec Array 4TB 42 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 3.5TB free Firmware: V1.0 Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 108%
Adaptec Array 3TB 59 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2TB free Firmware: V1.0 Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 50% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B2G70BH0-CK0 M393B2G70BH0-CK0 M393B2G70BH0-CK0 M393B2G70BH0-CK0 M393B2G70DB0-YK0 M393B2G70DB0-YK0 M393B2G70DB0-YK0 M393B2G70DB0-YK0 M393B2G70BH0-CK0 M393B... 512GB 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	68.6% Good	MC Read 47.8 MC Write 17.9 MC Mixed 22.3 84% 29.3 GB/s	SC Read 3.2 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 2.2 10% 3.47 GB/s	Latency 307 13% 307 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback