Asus P8P67

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8P67  (all builds)
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 22 '21 at 10:33
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Memory 94.5
1-Core 112
2-Core 229
83% 145 Pts
4-Core 452
8-Core 450
60% 451 Pts
64-Core 438
27% 438 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560-$180
Asus(1043 83B5) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
14% Very poor
Lighting 16.3
Reflection 23.3
Parallax 15.5
13% 18.4 fps
MRender 24.2
Gravity 17.7
Splatting 16.2
16% 19.4 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 6124
Write 3,703
Mixed 4,599
1,065% 4,808 MB/s
4K Read 374
4K Write 78.8
4K Mixed 98.7
735% 184 MB/s
DQ Read 1,312
DQ Write 668
DQ Mixed 855
671% 945 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 126%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
480GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 118 120 119 120 120 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 72.4
Write 32.2
Mixed 71.1
SusWrite 119
55% 73.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
219% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 75%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 040B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 100 102 100 100 99 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
75.4% Very good
Read 163
Write 117
Mixed 73.1
SusWrite 100
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 99%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 6TB
4TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 86 84 87 87 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 115
Write 110
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 85.6
69% 93.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.6
209% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
62.4% Good
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 20.1
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 18.6
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 58.5
68% 58.5 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 Builds (Compare 1,494 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $666
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback