Intel DZ77GA-70K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics57.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemINTEL DZ77GA
MotherboardIntel DZ77GA-70K  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130521
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 12 '17 at 09:07
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
81% Excellent
Memory 91.7
1-Core 99.6
2-Core 202
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 386
8-Core 518
57% 452 Pts
64-Core 519
32% 519 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 81%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 Fury-X-$781
CLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.6.1
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57.2% Above average
Lighting 71.9
Reflection 56.6
Parallax 98.5
59% 75.6 fps
MRender 52.4
Gravity 72.2
Splatting 72.2
55% 65.6 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 65%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 1 Volume 2TB
788GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 423
Write 248
Mixed 293
71% 322 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 45.3
4K Mixed 16.1
74% 27 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 22.3
61% 128 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 105%
Intel 520 Series 480GB-$249
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 400i Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 506
Write 235
Mixed 246
72% 329 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 17.4
4K Mixed 17.6
70% 20.1 MB/s
DQ Read 226
DQ Write 94.1
DQ Mixed 69.5
75% 130 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
58.5% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 18.8
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 19.1
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DZ77GA-70K Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel DZ77GA-70K - $90

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $402
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback