Acer Aspire VN7-791G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemAcer Aspire VN7-791G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire VN7-791G
Memory2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩,
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150109
Uptime216 Days
Run DateApr 10 '21 at 05:11
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Memory 85.6
1-Core 103
2-Core 196
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 365
8-Core 488
54% 427 Pts
64-Core 494
31% 494 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Acer(1025 091D) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3643
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4.1% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 18.6
Parallax 8.3
4% 10.6 fps
MRender 8
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 5
4% 5.17 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.1%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBU-SNS8100S3128GD 128GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8FM06.9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 48 164 26 165 26 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 417
Write 309
Mixed 215
SusWrite 120
59% 265 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 51.7
4K Mixed 16.7
78% 29.3 MB/s
DQ Read 167
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 60
83% 150 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 80%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$46
437GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 80 81 81 83 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 84.7
Write 64
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 81.2
51% 69.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend TS1GSK64W6H Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
56.7% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 16.8
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 19.5
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire VN7-791G Builds (Compare 259 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire VN7-791G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback