Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199 30,496 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	58.2% Above average	Memory 79.6 1-Core 90.6 2-Core 160 65% 110 Pts	4-Core 216 8-Core 216 29% 216 Pts	64-Core 217 13% 217 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 21F3) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4425 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	3.43% Terrible	Lighting 4.2 Reflection 1.9 Parallax 3 3% 3.03 fps	MRender 4.5 Gravity 2.5 Splatting 5.2 3% 4.07 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.43% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNF12 128GB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: N103 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 224 Write 216 Mixed 216 49% 219 MB/s	4K Read 17.7 4K Write 28.4 4K Mixed 23.5 72% 23.2 MB/s	DQ Read 184 DQ Write 148 DQ Mixed 178 130% 170 MB/s
Poor: 50% Great: 87%
Colorful SL500 2 240GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 223GB free Firmware: 5L SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 356 364 377 377 376 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	89.2% Excellent	Read 471 Write 377 Mixed 317 SusWrite 370 86% 384 MB/s	4K Read 26.3 4K Write 50.1 4K Mixed 34.5 111% 37 MB/s	DQ Read 277 DQ Write 315 DQ Mixed 192 173% 261 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 89.2% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 8GB 54 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	49.2% Average	MC Read 17.5 MC Write 17.5 MC Mixed 15.7 48% 16.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 15.5 44% 15.5 GB/s	Latency 81.3 49% 81.3 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16