Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6500-$67 241,476 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	55.5% Above average	Memory 75.1 1-Core 94.7 2-Core 132 62% 101 Pts	4-Core 216 8-Core 179 27% 197 Pts	64-Core 150 9% 150 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$31 14,082 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 165GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 352 340 349 351 352 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 454 Write 350 Mixed 303 SusWrite 349 82% 364 MB/s	4K Read 34.8 4K Write 109 4K Mixed 46.5 170% 63.4 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 310 DQ Mixed 262 219% 319 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 214 216 216 215 219 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 106%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C17 2x8GB 168 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	52.9% Above average	MC Read 17 MC Write 21.5 MC Mixed 19.8 56% 19.4 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 12.4 35% 12.2 GB/s	Latency 90.2 44% 90.2 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 89%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 26%

Raft

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	558x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	396x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	241x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	91x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	90x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBCorsair $46Bench 69%, 47,721 samples	55x

Value: 102% - Outstanding

Total price: $420

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16