PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 23.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 39.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock H61M-VS (all builds) |
Memory | 4.9 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120727 |
Uptime | 1.6 Days |
Run Date | Mar 23 '21 at 07:06 |
Run Duration | 152 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 14% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
|
63.6%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 280X-$500
PowerColor(148C 3001) 3GB
CLim: 1030 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 21.3.1
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
23.4%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 191 12 66 65 57 MB/s
|
39.1%
Below average
|
|||
Jmicron Generic 750GB
255GB free
Firmware: 0508
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 28 28 28 MB/s
|
17.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 1TB (2016)-$70
536GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 181 183 184 185 183 MB/s
|
75.1%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G KP223C-ELD 10GB
1067, 1067 MHz
8192, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
23.6%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples | 62x |
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 41x |
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 29x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 54x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 26x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 17x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 60% - Good | Total price: $77 |