HP Compaq 6000 Pro SFF PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive59% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP Compaq 6000 Pro SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3048h
Memory3.7 GB free of 6.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151019
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateMar 20 '21 at 16:41
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
46% Average
Memory 73.4
1-Core 27.7
2-Core 55.5
37% 52.2 Pts
4-Core 110
8-Core 110
15% 110 Pts
64-Core 109
7% 109 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 46%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Q45/Q43 Express Chipset
HP(103C 3048)
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 0.8
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.57 fps
Splatting 1.9
2% 1.9 fps
Poor: 0% Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 128GB SSD 128GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 211 236 218 177 207 MB/s
Performing below potential (41st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59% Above average
Read 254
Write 229
Mixed 218
SusWrite 214
52% 229 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 45.3
4K Mixed 22.6
93% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 34.4
62% 124 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 59%
Great: 99%
General UDisk 4GB
1GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.6 1.5 1.9 1.4 1.8 1.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
2.23% Terrible
Read 4.2
Write 1.5
Mixed 2.7
SusWrite 1.7
3% 2.52 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.2
21% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.23%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 CE M378B2873FH0-CH9 ID:01 98 KP223C-ELD ID:80 CE M378B2873FH0-CH9 ID:01 98 KP223C-ELD 42GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz
1024, 2048, 1024, 2048, 36864 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.4% Very poor
MC Read 7.3
MC Write 4.6
MC Mixed 4.9
16% 5.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 5.6
15% 5.4 GB/s
Latency 93.7
43% 93.7 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 18%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 6000 Pro SFF PC Builds (Compare 442 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6000 Pro SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $117
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback