Asus P8B75-M LX

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	15.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus P8B75-M LX (all builds)
Memory	6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130117
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 24 '17 at 17:02
Run Duration	120 Seconds
Run User	VNM-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3240 37,789 User benchmarks, average bench 55% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	65.2% Good	Memory 90.2 1-Core 93.5 2-Core 150 68% 111 Pts	4-Core 235 8-Core 234 31% 234 Pts	64-Core 234 14% 234 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Gigabyte(1458 3767) 2GB CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.53 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	15.8% Very poor	Lighting 19.7 Reflection 15.5 Parallax 18.5 16% 17.9 fps	MRender 16.4 Gravity 19 Splatting 20.3 15% 18.6 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.8% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PH4-CE120 120GB 793 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 46GB free (System drive) Firmware: F/W:1.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1172 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 360 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 93 93 111 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1900632 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 13 (C2) HDA temperature 67 67 141736083489 (DA) Unknown 100 100 6659 (E7) Temperature 100 100 97 (F1) Unknown 100 100 2004	37.5% Below average	Read 168 Write 114 Mixed 175 34% 152 MB/s	4K Read 24.7 4K Write 49.7 4K Mixed 8.87 75% 27.8 MB/s	DQ Read 34.4 DQ Write 75.1 DQ Mixed 10.9 21% 40.1 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 82%
Samsung HD252HJ 250GB 8,167 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 78GB free Firmware: 1AC01110 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 99 99 585 (03) Spinup time 93 93 2970 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6047 (05) Reallocated sector count 99 99 13 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 28146 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 24 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 5799 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 123 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 123 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 49 622395429 (C2) HDA temperature 61 47 655949863 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 227273 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 99 97 51 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 98 15 (C8) Write error rate 100 99 205 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	48.6% Average	Read 83.9 Write 85.1 Mixed 31.1 49% 66.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.54 4K Mixed 0.41 114% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown FLFF65F-D8KM9 859B ST51264BA1339.16FM 8GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	48.6% Average	MC Read 17.1 MC Write 16.8 MC Mixed 15.3 47% 16.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.2 SC Write 15.7 SC Mixed 15.1 43% 15 GB/s	Latency 66.9 60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8B75-M LX Builds (Compare 1,057 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M LX

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	179x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	158x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	104x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	80x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	69x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	57x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	47x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	32x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	24x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	37x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	29x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16