Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.41% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160531
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 11 '17 at 23:28
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$125
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
63.9% Good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 66.1
2-Core 130
58% 93.3 Pts
4-Core 237
8-Core 356
37% 297 Pts
64-Core 364
22% 364 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
Sapphire(174B E263) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1320 MHz, MLim: 1080 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.1.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
8.41% Terrible
Lighting 10.6
Reflection 13.4
Parallax 14.5
9% 12.8 fps
MRender 7.67
Gravity 10.5
Splatting 10.5
8% 9.55 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 8.41%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001YAM1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 84.9
Write 74.4
Mixed 13
42% 57.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 0.32
4K Mixed 0.09
29% 0.24 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-10666CL9-8GBNT Samsung M378B5673EH1-CH9 Samsung M378B5673EH1-CH9 Samsung M378B5673EH1-CH9 14GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
41.9% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 13.9
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 10.7
27% 9.37 GB/s
Latency 73.3
55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Extreme3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 467 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $517
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback