| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 6.03% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 65.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Fujitsu CELSIUS W510 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | FUJITSU D3067-A1 |
| Memory | 12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20120719 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 05 '21 at 21:51 |
| Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
| Run User | NOR-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E31270
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
|
72.6%
Very good
|
69% 119 Pts
|
50% 400 Pts
|
28% 445 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro 2000
Nvidia(10DE 084A) 1GB
CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.84
|
6.03%
Terrible
|
6% 7.73 fps
|
6% 8.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 505CUA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 236 241 238 234 222 MB/s
|
65.1%
Good
|
57% 256 MB/s
|
81% 27 MB/s
|
146% 222 MB/s
|
|
CARDER READER 134GB
125GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.1 5.2 7.8 7.8 7.8 6.8 MB/s
|
4.56%
Terrible
|
6% 5.57 MB/s
|
30% 1.83 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nanya NT4GC72B8PB0NF-CG 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
47.9%
Average
|
46% 16.3 GB/s
|
43% 15.1 GB/s
|
54% 74.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical CELSIUS W510 Builds (Compare 53 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W510
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E31220Intel $305Bench 68%, 2,507 samples | 12x |
| Xeon E3-1240IntelBench 70%, 2,292 samples | 11x |
| Xeon E31225IntelBench 69%, 3,353 samples | 9x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 9x |
| Quadro 600NvidiaBench 3%, 15,964 samples | 7x |
| Quadro P2000NvidiaBench 41%, 13,958 samples | 6x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 52% - Above average | Total price: $552 |