Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 117%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 139%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive247% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory59.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200724
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '21 at 23:07
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Memory 72.5
1-Core 156
2-Core 312
95% 180 Pts
4-Core 618
8-Core 1,247
110% 932 Pts
64-Core 2,352
146% 2,352 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Nvidia(10DE 1E84) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Lighting 162
Reflection 160
Parallax 158
132% 160 fps
MRender 191
Gravity 139
Splatting 120
119% 150 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 122%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2117 2335 2321 2314 2225 2233 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
247% Outstanding
Read 1,070
Write 1,305
Mixed 918
SusWrite 2,257
315% 1,388 MB/s
4K Read 7.7
4K Write 31.7
4K Mixed 19.3
53% 19.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,004
DQ Write 1,230
DQ Mixed 1,111
839% 1,115 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 247%
Great: 448%
Amd-raid TOSHIBA-TR150 960GB
894GB free
Firmware: SAFZ
SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 300 297 298 235 216 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 302
Write 343
Mixed 302
SusWrite 273
69% 305 MB/s
4K Read 7.9
4K Write 8.5
4K Mixed 7.2
26% 7.87 MB/s
DQ Read 83.4
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 82.4
77% 116 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 72%
Amd-raid Samsung SSD 860 4TB
951GB free
Firmware: RVQ0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 329 327 327 322 322 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 384
Write 401
Mixed 344
SusWrite 324
82% 363 MB/s
4K Read 8.2
4K Write 15.5
4K Mixed 11.3
35% 11.7 MB/s
DQ Read 92.3
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 112
93% 130 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 89%
Amd-raid Samsung SSD 870 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: SVQ0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 329 328 327 322 322 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
55% Above average
Read 403
Write 403
Mixed 386
SusWrite 325
86% 379 MB/s
4K Read 11.1
4K Write 16.3
4K Mixed 12.2
41% 13.2 MB/s
DQ Read 97.2
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 121
98% 134 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 55%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX3200C16D4/32GX 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
87.2% Excellent
MC Read 34.1
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 31.5
92% 32.3 GB/s
SC Read 23
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 29.9
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 95.7
42% 95.7 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING Builds (Compare 8,244 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING - $460

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,706
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback