Gigabyte GA-E6010N

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-E6010N  (all builds)
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20200317
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 29 '21 at 18:51
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E1-6010 APU R2 Graphics
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.35 GHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
25.6% Poor
Memory 44.7
1-Core 20.4
2-Core 39.7
24% 34.9 Pts
4-Core 40
8-Core 38
5% 39 Pts
64-Core 40.1
2% 40.1 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 30%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.12
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.33% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 0.9
1% 1.63 fps
MRender 2.2
Gravity 2.8
Splatting 2.4
2% 2.47 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.33%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte GP-GSTFS31240GN 240GB
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 177 261 138 90 224 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Read 163
Write 130
Mixed 33
SusWrite 168
89% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 4.6
694% 4.03 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 95%
Unidad de disco 4GB
3GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 4.2 4.7 3.7 3.6 3.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
6.14% Terrible
Read 14.8
Write 3.8
Mixed 6
SusWrite 3.8
8% 7.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.3
47% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.14%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix 4G1600CL11 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.7% Very poor
MC Read 4.9
MC Write 3.1
MC Mixed 4.1
12% 4.03 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 5.5
12% 4.13 GB/s
Latency 182
22% 182 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-E6010N Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-E6010N

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback