Asus H110-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics68.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H110-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory7.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160202
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateJun 04 '17 at 10:21
Run Duration819 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Memory 91.8
1-Core 127
2-Core 250
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 436
8-Core 688
69% 562 Pts
64-Core 692
43% 692 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Gainward(10B0 13C0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1468 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
68.9% Good
Lighting 88.6
Reflection 88
Parallax 77.3
72% 84.6 fps
MRender 83.1
Gravity 79.2
Splatting 69.6
62% 77.3 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 403
Mixed 404
96% 431 MB/s
4K Read 40.1
4K Write 78.6
4K Mixed 36.4
149% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 260
DQ Write 260
DQ Mixed 22
82% 181 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 101%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$27
644GB free
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Read 147
Write 162
Mixed 144
113% 151 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 1.53
4K Mixed 0.32
94% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 112%
Kingston DataTraveler 112 16GB
9GB free, PID 162a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
2.16% Terrible
Read 7.66
Write 2.37
Mixed 3.43
5% 4.49 MB/s
4K Read 2.12
4K Write 0.009
4K Mixed 0.008
8% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.16%
Great: 8%
USB2.0 FlashDisk 1GB
1GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
4.95% Terrible
Read 16.2
Write 2.28
Mixed 3.99
7% 7.5 MB/s
4K Read 8.49
4K Write 0.03
4K Mixed 0.03
34% 2.85 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.95%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
75.2% Very good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 23.1
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 29.7
SC Mixed 23.3
68% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,745 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus H110-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $370
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback