Samsung R519/R719

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 17%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive3.11% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemSamsung R519/R719  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG R519/R719
Memory0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091124
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 31 '18 at 00:27
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 88%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium T4300
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Memory 67.3
1-Core 27.1
2-Core 45.4
34% 46.6 Pts
4-Core 47.7
8-Core 36.8
6% 42.2 Pts
64-Core 53.7
3% 53.7 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
Sanyo(144D C059)
Driver: igdumdx32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2302
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.15% Terrible
Lighting 0.13
Reflection 0.35
Parallax 0.41
0% 0.3 fps
MRender 0.33
Gravity 0.27
Splatting 0.22
0% 0.27 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.15%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Disk drive 250GB
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 12 22 29 18 32 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
3.11% Terrible
Read 30.5
Write 22.7
Mixed 16.7
SusWrite 22
5% 23 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
2% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 3.11%
Great: 284%
Kingston DataTraveler 112 16GB
4GB free, PID 162a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
2.04% Terrible
Read 7.5
Write 2.2
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 2.4
4% 3.45 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
7% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.04%
Great: 8%
Single Flash Reader 2GB
2GB free, PID 6335
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 9.7 9.6 9.8 9.6 9.2 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
5.18% Terrible
Read 17.7
Write 9.2
Mixed 7
SusWrite 9.5
13% 10.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.18%
Great: 7%
WD My Passport 07A8 1TB
69GB free, PID 07a8
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 19 19 20 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Read 28.6
Write 23.7
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 19.3
30% 22.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.3% Very poor
MC Read 4.1
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 3.4
10% 3.67 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 2.5
SC Mixed 2.9
8% 2.73 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical R519/R719 Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung R519/R719

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback