Lenovo 80TW

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 96% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemLenovo 80TW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Torronto 5C3
Memory5.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161110
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateJan 14 '21 at 18:48
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 96%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
40.4% Average
Memory 51.5
1-Core 80.9
2-Core 125
50% 85.7 Pts
4-Core 171
8-Core 165
23% 168 Pts
64-Core 214
13% 214 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Legend(17AA 3802) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4973
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
3.02% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 3.2
Parallax 5.6
3% 4.33 fps
MRender 3.4
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 0.1
2% 3.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.02%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD10JPCX-24UE4T0 1TB
530GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 34 30 36 38 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
Read 32.3
Write 80.5
Mixed 39.3
SusWrite 35.3
35% 46.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3AZ Ramaxel RMSA3260MB78HAF2400 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
38.2% Below average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 11.6
MC Mixed 13.2
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 13.3
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 155
26% 155 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80TW Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80TW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 37% - Below average Total price: $35
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback