MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive95.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C51
MotherboardMSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 12 '21 at 10:49
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Memory 83.8
1-Core 137
2-Core 273
90% 165 Pts
4-Core 440
8-Core 683
69% 561 Pts
64-Core 681
42% 681 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS250G2B0A-00SM50 250GB
128GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 220 225 226 224 216 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Read 394
Write 274
Mixed 322
SusWrite 224
68% 303 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 50.2
164% 61.2 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 277
DQ Mixed 244
206% 301 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 105%
Adata SP900 256GB-$300
154GB free
Firmware: 5.4.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 208 203 205 210 183 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Read 340
Write 276
Mixed 270
SusWrite 204
61% 273 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 93.2
4K Mixed 42
148% 55 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 200
155% 211 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 89%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
667GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 186 187 185 190 187 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 156
Mixed 89.3
SusWrite 187
112% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
148% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 104%
Great: 112%
PNY Lovely Attache 16GB
15GB free, PID 6001
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 6.8 6.9 6.9 6.8 6.9 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
7.52% Terrible
Read 30.7
Write 6.7
Mixed 8.4
SusWrite 6.7
14% 13.1 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
25% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 7.52%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
MC Read 34
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 31.9
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 26.3
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 35.1
84% 29.4 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) Builds (Compare 3,890 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $300
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback