| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 3.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-Q1542 (all builds) |
| Memory | 2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20120622 |
| Uptime | 9.6 Days |
| Run Date | May 30 '17 at 07:25 |
| Run Duration | 137 Seconds |
| Run User | ZAF-User |
| Background CPU | 42% |
PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
56.3%
Above average
|
57% 94.2 Pts
|
25% 184 Pts
|
12% 193 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Clevo(1558 2701) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3355
|
3.41%
Terrible
|
3% 3.97 fps
|
4% 4.59 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Transcend JM1333KSN-4G 859B CT51264BF160B.C16F 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
50%
Above average
|
50% 17.5 GB/s
|
40% 14 GB/s
|
51% 78.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-Q1542 Builds (Compare 10 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Q1542
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples | 4x |
| Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples | 3x |
| Celeron 1000MIntelBench 42%, 3,569 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 38% - Below average | Total price: $111 |