Asrock A320M-DVS R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-DVS R4.0  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200716
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateJan 07 '21 at 17:42
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 Quad-Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Memory 74.6
1-Core 116
2-Core 223
76% 138 Pts
4-Core 440
8-Core 441
59% 441 Pts
64-Core 441
27% 441 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gigabyte(1458 3681) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Lighting 21.4
Reflection 18
Parallax 20.5
17% 20 fps
MRender 24.9
Gravity 22.7
Splatting 16.3
17% 21.3 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Xraydisk 128GB 128GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 108 17 89 18 53 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 512
Write 270
Mixed 334
SusWrite 85.9
66% 301 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 99.1
4K Mixed 29.5
136% 53 MB/s
DQ Read 71.3
DQ Write 270
DQ Mixed 39.3
68% 127 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
300GB free
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 114 114 115 115 115 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 119
Write 112
Mixed 61.5
SusWrite 114
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown R744G2606U1S 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 42.9
MC Write 38.6
MC Mixed 33.2
109% 38.2 GB/s
SC Read 26.5
SC Write 42
SC Mixed 29.7
94% 32.7 GB/s
Latency 91.2
44% 91.2 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 105%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-DVS R4.0 Builds (Compare 763 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-DVS R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $359
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback