Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics46.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory24.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateDec 31 '20 at 19:07
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 77.7
1-Core 122
2-Core 253
82% 151 Pts
4-Core 404
8-Core 786
71% 595 Pts
64-Core 944
58% 944 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1328 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.12.1
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
46.6% Average
Lighting 58.4
Reflection 61.3
Parallax 79.7
48% 66.5 fps
MRender 61
Gravity 60.6
Splatting 46
45% 55.9 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Scorch M2 512GB
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FM11.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 597 522 401 378 338 339 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 725
Write 725
Mixed 795
SusWrite 429
151% 669 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 41.8
4K Mixed 32.1
106% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 600
DQ Write 91.5
DQ Mixed 146
158% 279 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 104%
Great: 164%
Hyundai 120GB SSD 120GB
54GB free
Firmware: V3.10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 72 70 74 67 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 438
Write 368
Mixed 277
SusWrite 111
66% 298 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 37.3
4K Mixed 11.8
73% 24.7 MB/s
DQ Read 83.6
DQ Write 69.2
DQ Mixed 17.9
29% 56.9 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 84%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
639GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 80 77 79 74 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
44% Average
Read 75.3
Write 73.4
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 77.7
52% 70.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44%
Great: 57%
Seagate BUP Slim SL 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0108
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 110 101 111 102 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
54% Above average
Read 81
Write 115
Mixed 72.4
SusWrite 106
69% 93.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.6
193% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 54%
Great: 65%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 126 123 128 119 128 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
73.4% Very good
Read 131
Write 145
Mixed 94
SusWrite 124
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
209% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 101%
Generic- Compact Flash 64GB
14GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 34 32 35 30 35 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Read 33.8
Write 30.5
Mixed 33.3
SusWrite 33.2
45% 32.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 2.1
138% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 18%
WD My Passport 0740 500GB
461GB free, PID 0740
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 91.6
Write 78.7
Mixed 58.2
94% 76.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2666 C16 Series 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
77.9% Very good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 25.8
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 25.2
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 84.8
47% 84.8 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,661 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $138

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $661
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback