Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	9.12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	73.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock Z77 Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121128
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 22 '17 at 13:29
Run Duration	244 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319 147,533 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	82.3% Excellent	Memory 92.3 1-Core 108 2-Core 214 80% 138 Pts	4-Core 392 8-Core 550 59% 471 Pts	64-Core 550 34% 550 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 82.3% Great: 83%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel HD 3000 (Desktop V2 1.35 GHz)-$15 6,831 User benchmarks, average bench 2% ASRock(1849 0122) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	2.33% Terrible	Lighting 2.53 Reflection 3.88 Parallax 1.72 2% 2.71 fps	MRender 3.81 Gravity 1.4 Splatting 4.74 3% 3.32 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.33% Great: 2%
Nvidia GTX 650-$112 69,673 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Asus(1043 8439) 1GB CLim: 1071 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	9.12% Terrible	Lighting 10.2 Reflection 9.54 Parallax 11.9 8% 10.5 fps	MRender 13.7 Gravity 12.4 Splatting 13.3 11% 13.1 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 9.12% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 227GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 769 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 24 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 58 55 42 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 8 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1263950201	73.8% Very good	Read 381 Write 309 Mixed 313 74% 334 MB/s	4K Read 29.7 4K Write 43.7 4K Mixed 27.4 103% 33.6 MB/s	DQ Read 219 DQ Write 147 DQ Mixed 17.2 58% 128 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 73.8% Great: 134%
Crucial BX100 250GB-$141 42,930 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 96GB free Firmware: MU02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1119 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1802 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 66 (A3) Unknown 100 100 25 (A4) Unknown 100 100 164002 (A5) Unknown 100 100 203 (A6) Unknown 100 100 103 (A7) Unknown 100 100 161 (A8) Unknown 100 100 2000 (A9) Unknown 100 100 95 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 103 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 53 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 131465 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 1 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 6 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 172817 (F2) Unknown 100 100 172709 (F5) Unknown 100 100 1312016	73.3% Very good	Read 524 Write 367 Mixed 426 98% 439 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 66.9 4K Mixed 17.9 95% 36.3 MB/s	DQ Read 25.4 DQ Write 63.5 DQ Mixed 69.5 46% 52.8 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 103%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100 65,786 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 305GB free Firmware: 1AA01113 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 99 25 599 (03) Spinup time 67 67 10630 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7424 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 13 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 10004 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 15090 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1527 (0D) Soft read error rate 99 25 68 (B7) Unknown 100 100 11 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 66518 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 60 522125343 (C2) HDA temperature 68 57 331251384352 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 93329 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 13 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 1 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 1 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 107 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	56% Above average	Read 94.4 Write 100 Mixed 99 74% 97.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.06 4K Mixed 0.43 119% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 62%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 90GB free Firmware: CC38 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 99 78 26291372 (03) Spinup time 95 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 8190 (05) Reallocated sector count 97 97 155 (07) Seek error rate 78 60 67931020 (09) Power-on hours count 75 75 22138 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 37 2940 (B7) Unknown 46 46 54 (B8) Unknown 1 1 128 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 1767 (BC) Unknown 100 96 64425492561 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 55 639828005 (C2) HDA temperature 37 45 60129542181 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 29 20 26291372 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 81 7 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 81 7 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 151 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 77438260372915 (F1) Unknown 100 253 3990228494 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1428526178	56% Above average	Read 104 Write 90.9 Mixed 78.5 68% 91.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 1.02 4K Mixed 0.4 88% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 68%
WDC WD20 03FYPS-27W9B0 2TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 418GB free, PID 2351 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	19.6% Very poor	Read 33.9 Write 33.6 Mixed 15.3 34% 27.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 2.36 4K Mixed 0.27 92% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 19.6% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB 117 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	48.9% Average	MC Read 16.3 MC Write 16.8 MC Mixed 15.2 46% 16.1 GB/s	SC Read 15 SC Write 18.4 SC Mixed 16.5 48% 16.6 GB/s	Latency 63.4 63% 63.4 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 74%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,016 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $165

CPU
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	1,526x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	951x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	558x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	310x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	269x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	237x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $75Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	174x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	140x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	107x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	90x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	86x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	81x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $576

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16