PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 29.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | MSI MS-7A75 |
Motherboard | MSI Z270 GAMING PLUS (MS-7A75) (all builds) |
Memory | 9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20171117 |
Uptime | 4.5 Days |
Run Date | Dec 26 '20 at 22:57 |
Run Duration | 108 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 57% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
64.8%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.4%
Poor
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 1TB (2016)-$70
419GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 121 122 123 124 116 MB/s
|
50.1%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown BLS8G4D240FSE.16FBD2 029E CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
53.4%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples | 792x |
Core i5-7600KIntel $190Bench 76%, 195,006 samples | 337x |
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 173x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 234x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 227x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 219x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 92% - Outstanding | Total price: $463 |