Lenovo 2555CTO

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	50.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Lenovo 2555CTO (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory	9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130227
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 17 '17 at 02:57
Run Duration	89 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1245 V2-$368 2,442 User benchmarks, average bench 73% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	73.8% Very good	Memory 84.5 1-Core 101 2-Core 200 74% 128 Pts	4-Core 340 8-Core 499 52% 420 Pts	64-Core 502 31% 502 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 73.8% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 600 15,964 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Nvidia(10DE 0835) 1GB CLim: 640 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 362.13 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.2% Terrible	Lighting 3.9 Reflection 4.46 Parallax 3.53 3% 3.96 fps	MRender 5.48 Gravity 4.13 Splatting 2.83 3% 4.15 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.2% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZMPC256HAFU-000 256GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 11GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM7 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 32909 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 146 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 92 92 280 (B2) Unknown 95 95 174 (B3) Unknown 95 95 348 (B4) Unknown 95 95 7716 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 63 27 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 0 (E9) Unknown 200 200 0 (EA) Unknown 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 20 (EC) Unknown 99 99 151 (ED) Unknown 99 99 280 (EE) Unknown 99 99 348	50.9% Above average	Read 463 Write 224 Mixed 292 72% 326 MB/s	4K Read 17.3 4K Write 39.5 4K Mixed 9.95 60% 22.3 MB/s	DQ Read 18.4 DQ Write 39.1 DQ Mixed 9.69 13% 22.4 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M391B1G73BH0-CK0 2x8GB 192 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	56% Above average	MC Read 21.3 MC Write 19.5 MC Mixed 17.2 55% 19.3 GB/s	SC Read 16.3 SC Write 17.4 SC Mixed 18.5 50% 17.4 GB/s	Latency 72.5 55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 2555CTO Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 2555CTO

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	5x
Xeon E3-1275 V2Intel $400Bench 74%, 461 samples	4x
Core i5-3550Intel $335Bench 69%, 23,599 samples	2x

GPU
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	4x
GTX 780-TiNvidia $410Bench 53%, 30,815 samples	2x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	2x

SSD
CS900 480GBPNY $42Bench 79%, 17,946 samples	2x
SU635 240GBAdata $20Bench 68%, 12,702 samples	2x
CS900 120GBPNY $25Bench 69%, 42,924 samples	2x

RAM
KHX1600C10D3/8GX 859B BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. KHX1600C10D3/8GX 859B BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 32GBKingstonBench 49%, 17 samples	4x
M391B1G73BH0-CK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 52%, 192 samples	3x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 859B RM51264BA1339.16FR HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 859B RM51264BA1339.16FR 16GBHynixBench 51%, 2 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $339

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16