HP 500-410nf

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 500-410nf  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B17
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141023
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 12 '17 at 18:27
Run Duration99 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-6500 APU-$135
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Memory 83
1-Core 70
2-Core 123
58% 92 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 209
28% 209 Pts
64-Core 207
13% 207 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8570D
HP(103C 2B17) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1101.0
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
4.78% Terrible
Lighting 5.57
Reflection 8.15
Parallax 4.88
4% 6.2 fps
MRender 5.48
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 8.61
5% 6.09 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.78%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 80GB-$60
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4PC10362 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
32.4% Below average
Read 251
Write 91.4
Mixed 133
35% 159 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 27.4
4K Mixed 12.9
52% 18 MB/s
DQ Read 15.9
DQ Write 31.2
DQ Mixed 9.24
11% 18.8 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP698650-154-KEB 99U5402-052.A00G 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.8% Below average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 6.2
MC Mixed 11.5
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 7.3
SC Mixed 10.7
26% 9.03 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 500-410nf Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP 500-410nf

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $135
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback