Fujitsu STYLISTIC R726

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.05% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemFujitsu STYLISTIC R726  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNBB43
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170510
Uptime2 Days
Run DateDec 06 '20 at 19:15
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
52.1% Above average
Memory 71.5
1-Core 63.4
2-Core 92.2
49% 75.7 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 200
26% 195 Pts
64-Core 198
12% 198 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Fujitsu(10CF 18D3) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4542
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
5.05% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 3.6
Parallax 5.1
5% 4.77 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 5
Splatting 9.8
6% 6.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.05%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN256HMHQ-00007 256GB
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAV2106Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 371 416 395 399 401 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 477
Write 31.3
Mixed 348
SusWrite 383
69% 310 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 72.6
4K Mixed 43.8
147% 50.3 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 354
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 104%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung HMT451S6AFR88-BB 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
53.1% Above average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 18
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 12.8
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 97.9
41% 97.9 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STYLISTIC R726 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu STYLISTIC R726

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback