PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 47.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 59.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z620 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 158A |
Memory | 6.1 GB free of 96 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150527 |
Uptime | 14.6 Days |
Run Date | Nov 26 '20 at 21:00 |
Run Duration | 163 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 4% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2660 0
CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
|
66.5%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
47.8%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM05B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 136 125 121 115 112 MB/s
|
59.1%
Above average
|
|||
Samsung Portable SSD T3 500GB
45GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 151 150 150 151 148 MB/s
|
43%
Average
|
|||
Seagate ST1000NM0011 1TB
247GB free
Firmware: PA03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 52 50 44 53 61 MB/s
|
35.5%
Below average
|
|||
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$32
179GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 46 41 37 40 50 MB/s
|
23.7%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Micron 36JSZF1G72PZ-1G4D 12x8GB
12 of 12 slots used
96GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
78.7%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples | 152x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples | 148x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples | 130x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 172x |
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples | 113x |
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 96x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 66% - Good | Total price: $345 |