Intel Emerald Lake

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemIntel HuronRiver Platform
MotherboardIntel Emerald Lake  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110322
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 22 '20 at 18:01
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
16% Very poor
Memory 24.1
1-Core 72.4
2-Core 34.7
28% 43.7 Pts
4-Core 47
8-Core 44.5
6% 45.8 Pts
64-Core 23.5
2% 23.5 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 16%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Intel(8086 2010) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
1.18% Terrible
Lighting 1.17
Reflection 1.73
Parallax 0.81
1% 1.24 fps
MRender 3.05
Gravity 0.67
Splatting 2.22
2% 1.98 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.18%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18
246GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 65 47 59 59 66 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
38.3% Below average
Read 73.1
Write 71.8
Mixed 46.2
SusWrite 60.1
46% 62.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
C1RA0-003-QBEX.... 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.2% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 13.8
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 2.9
SC Write 1.8
SC Mixed 1.3
6% 2 GB/s
Latency 292
14% 292 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Emerald Lake Builds (Compare 110 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel Emerald Lake

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $199
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback