Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	32.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4400+-$50 2,970 User benchmarks, average bench 34% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	35.2% Below average	Memory 60.9 1-Core 30.3 2-Core 53.3 33% 48.2 Pts	4-Core 59.9 8-Core 50.2 8% 55.1 Pts	64-Core 62.2 4% 62.2 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 45%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Apple SS D TS256B 251GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 172GB free (System drive) Firmware: AGAA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	32.2% Below average	Read 199 Write 159 Mixed 202 42% 187 MB/s	4K Read 13 4K Write 29 4K Mixed 8.33 46% 16.8 MB/s	DQ Read 14.8 DQ Write 35.8 DQ Mixed 7.35 11% 19.3 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 32%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7 60,636 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 8GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	7.2% Terrible	Read 29.1 Write 8.56 Mixed 14.4 19% 17.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.63 4K Write 0.008 4K Mixed 0.008 18% 1.55 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.2% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 2048, 1024 MB Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	11.3% Very poor	MC Read 3.3 MC Write 3.3 MC Mixed 3.6 10% 3.4 GB/s	SC Read 2.5 SC Write 2.8 SC Mixed 2.8 8% 2.7 GB/s	Latency 125 32% 125 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 11.3% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 38%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5600+AMDBench 39%, 3,286 samples	11x
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4000+AMDBench 31%, 2,693 samples	4x
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	3x

GPU
GeForce 6150SE nForce 430NvidiaBench 0%, 4,836 samples	12x
GeForce 6100NvidiaBench 0%, 335 samples	6x
GeForce 9500 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 27,834 samples	4x

SSD
256G B 256GBSSDBench 48%, 63 samples	4x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
SSD370S 256GBTranscend $115Bench 89%, 11,742 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16