HP Compaq 6200 Pro MT PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP Compaq 6200 Pro MT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1497
Memory2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111110
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateNov 11 '20 at 12:12
Run Duration252 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 87.9
1-Core 80.8
2-Core 160
66% 110 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 312
42% 315 Pts
64-Core 310
19% 310 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 70%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5570
Sapphire(174B E142) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
1.52% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 6.81
Parallax 5.09
0% 4 fps
MRender 5.67
Gravity 4.33
Splatting 5.65
4% 5.22 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.52%
Great: 5%
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 1497) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.01% Terrible
Lighting 1.07
Reflection 1.46
Parallax 0.91
1% 1.14 fps
MRender 1.86
Gravity 0.77
Splatting 1.96
1% 1.53 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.01%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D 250GB-$50
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61130WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 189 185 189 187 190 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
74.5% Very good
Read 414
Write 193
Mixed 248
SusWrite 188
58% 261 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 52.8
4K Mixed 28
104% 35.8 MB/s
DQ Read 364
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 252
209% 302 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 105%
H/W RAID 1 1TB
844GB free
Firmware: 8136
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 19 19 18 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Read 31.9
Write 25
Mixed 25.6
SusWrite 18.5
19% 25.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
178% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 103%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
222GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 99 102 100 99 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 73.8
Write 73.3
Mixed 53.4
SusWrite 100
55% 75.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 69%
H/W RAID 1 500GB
230GB free
Firmware: 8136
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 29 29 28 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Read 32
Write 22.3
Mixed 25.7
SusWrite 28.7
20% 27.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1
163% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 68%
WD My Passport 0837 1TB
61GB free, PID 0837
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 14 14 14 15 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 28.4
Write 20.4
Mixed 19.7
SusWrite 14.6
27% 20.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 Hynix HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 Hynix HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
45.5% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 14.8
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 11.9
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 69.6
57% 69.6 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 6200 Pro MT PC Builds (Compare 1,136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6200 Pro MT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $278
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback