TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UD3H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics13.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z77X-UD3H  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120822
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateNov 04 '20 at 15:42
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User LCA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Memory 96.4
1-Core 108
2-Core 212
81% 139 Pts
4-Core 419
8-Core 422
56% 420 Pts
64-Core 421
26% 421 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑
This bench: 84.4%
 Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K1200
Nvidia(10DE 1073) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.09
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Lighting 16.8
Reflection 13.1
Parallax 15
14% 15 fps
MRender 20.5
Gravity 16.5
Splatting 14.4
14% 17.1 fps
Poor: 13% ↑
This bench: 13.7%
 Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 57 72 67 76 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 102
Write 116
Mixed 62
SusWrite 67.2
64% 86.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
83% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑
This bench: 48.4%
 Great: 74%
Samsung HM400LI 400GB
65GB free
Firmware: 2TF00_00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 30 29 27 25 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Read 22.3
Write 28
Mixed 17.9
SusWrite 27.5
18% 23.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.3
62% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑
This bench: 14.4%
 Great: 36%
Seagate ST9250315AS 250GB-$30
35GB free
Firmware: 0010LVM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 60 61 60 60 61 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Read 61.6
Write 60.5
Mixed 38
SusWrite 60.5
40% 55.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑
This bench: 35.1%
 Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Samsung M391B5173QH0-YK0 8GB
1800, 1800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
65.4% Good
MC Read 23.9
MC Write 23.2
MC Mixed 20.7
65% 22.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 18.8
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 52.7
76% 52.7 ns
Poor: 45% ↑
This bench: 65.4%
 Great: 65%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GA-Z77X-UD3H Builds (Compare 1,572 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UD3H - $350

CPU
Core i5-3570KIntel  $50Bench 68%, 185,516 samples489x
Core i7-3770KIntel  $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples433x
Core i7-3770Intel  $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples274x
GPU
GTX 970Nvidia  $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples99x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples93x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel  $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples88x
SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples58x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples45x
MX500 1TBCrucial  $88Bench 106%, 202,785 samples36x
RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples47x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples45x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples41x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $700
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback