Asus M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141204
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 02 '20 at 16:43
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Memory 92.1
1-Core 116
2-Core 179
77% 129 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 591
58% 476 Pts
64-Core 588
36% 588 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 720
Asus(1043 8670) 2GB
CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 375.63
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
3.25% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 3.19
Parallax 3
3% 3.33 fps
MRender 4.33
Gravity 3.23
Splatting 5.13
4% 4.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.25%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
744GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA7L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 152 150 130 154 149 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Read 163
Write 175
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 150
94% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 107%
Samsung M3 Portable 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 61b5
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 42 43 42 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
20.3% Poor
Read 33.5
Write 33.2
Mixed 33.7
SusWrite 41.9
49% 35.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 52%
Generic- Multiple Reader 1GB
1GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 4.6 4.5 4.7 4.6 4.6 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
5.1% Terrible
Read 18.5
Write 3.5
Mixed 5.7
SusWrite 4.5
9% 8.05 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
28% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.1%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
32.4% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 10.7
MC Mixed 8.7
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 9.9
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 63.9
63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD Builds (Compare 532 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $222
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback