Dell Precision T3600

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics61.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision T3600
MotherboardDell Precision T3600  (all builds)
Memory56.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190625
Uptime29.2 Days
Run DateOct 08 '20 at 14:23
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2660 0
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
65.9% Good
Memory 77.7
1-Core 79.1
2-Core 152
61% 103 Pts
4-Core 291
8-Core 568
51% 430 Pts
64-Core 559
35% 559 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Asus(1043 877E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
61.6% Good
Lighting 85
Reflection 72.8
Parallax 62.5
69% 73.5 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 78.6
Splatting 0.09
47% 65.8 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dell PERC H310 1TB
668GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 69 48 60 92 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
51% Above average
Read 104
Write 99.5
Mixed 72.4
SusWrite 73.6
64% 87.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 51%
Great: 108%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61
3.5TB free
Firmware: MX4OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 326 369 367 360 370 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 58% Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung-00CE M393B2K70CM0-CF8 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72.9% Very good
MC Read 30
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 26.3
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 10.4
SC Mixed 10.3
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 84.9
47% 84.9 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision T3600 Builds (Compare 2,879 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell Precision T3600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $373
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback