MSI B85M-E45 (MS-7817)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics20.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7817
MotherboardMSI B85M-E45 (MS-7817)  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150421
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 13 '17 at 03:16
Run Duration241 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Memory 88.9
1-Core 108
2-Core 214
78% 137 Pts
4-Core 416
8-Core 417
56% 417 Pts
64-Core 419
26% 419 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Gainward(10B0 11C0) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.53
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
20.7% Poor
Lighting 24.2
Reflection 23.3
Parallax 30.2
20% 25.9 fps
MRender 32.6
Gravity 28.1
Splatting 24.2
23% 28.3 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 240GB-$117
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 00.U Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Read 508
Write 489
Mixed 499
112% 499 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 85
4K Mixed 12
101% 41.2 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 11.2
69% 153 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 111%
Seagate NAS HDD 4TB-$145
2.5TB free
Firmware: SC46 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Read 154
Write 150
Mixed 74.2
93% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.53
4K Mixed 0.19
68% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 100%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Read 155
Write 134
Mixed 139
107% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 2.08
4K Mixed 0.23
92% 1 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 86%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$90
1.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
64.4% Good
Read 110
Write 115
Mixed 104
82% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 1.98
4K Mixed 0.28
97% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 100%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$249
1.5TB free
Firmware: A5C0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 91
Write 79.3
Mixed 60.7
57% 77 MB/s
4K Read 0.85
4K Write 1.34
4K Mixed 0.33
96% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 85%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$249
1.5TB free
Firmware: A5C0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Read 130
Write 136
Mixed 99
91% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1.15
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.46
130% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 85%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA640 2TB-$41
966GB free
Firmware: AA10 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 106
Write 111
Mixed 107
81% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 1.82
4K Mixed 0.32
96% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-2133C9-8GBXH 0420 F3-2133C9-8GXH 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
61.5% Good
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 20.1
62% 21.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 18.5
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 68.6
58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85M-E45 (MS-7817) Builds (Compare 2,234 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI B85M-E45 (MS-7817) - $107

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $535
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback