MSI Z370 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B45)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics35.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive224% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B45
MotherboardMSI Z370 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B45)  (all builds)
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180709
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 06 '20 at 13:31
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$175
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Memory 90.3
1-Core 142
2-Core 281
94% 171 Pts
4-Core 544
8-Core 905
88% 724 Pts
64-Core 1,133
70% 1,133 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 452.06
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35.1% Below average
Lighting 39.6
Reflection 45.2
Parallax 37.2
32% 40.7 fps
MRender 56.5
Gravity 39.7
Splatting 51.8
40% 49.3 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
380GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 858 622 621 623 624 623 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
224% Outstanding
Read 1,667
Write 1,651
Mixed 639
SusWrite 662
258% 1,155 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 57.3
219% 85.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,032
DQ Write 1,234
DQ Mixed 958
771% 1,075 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 224%
Great: 254%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
193GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 271 271 270 271 271 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 477
Mixed 431
SusWrite 292
95% 423 MB/s
4K Read 43.1
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 56.9
194% 68.4 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 230
208% 316 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 114%
Great: 118%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
158GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 309 308 308 307 307 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 488
Mixed 390
SusWrite 327
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 46.5
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 62.2
214% 76.4 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 355
268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 123%
Great: 124%
WD WD10JPLX-00MBPT0 1TB
743GB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 128 133 126 129 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Read 140
Write 133
Mixed 32
SusWrite 129
79% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 75%
WD WD10JPLX-00MBPT0 1TB
384GB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 111 111 112 111 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 125
Write 122
Mixed 26
SusWrite 111
69% 95.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMU16GX4M2D3200C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.6% Good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 26.3
MC Mixed 20.9
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 29
SC Mixed 22.8
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 66.9
60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z370 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B45) Builds (Compare 1,992 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI Z370 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B45) - $210

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $1,083
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback