Asus Crosshair V Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics88.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive38.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Crosshair V Formula  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121017
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 30 '20 at 04:40
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
62% Good
Memory 79.7
1-Core 73.2
2-Core 140
59% 97.7 Pts
4-Core 240
8-Core 402
39% 321 Pts
64-Core 408
25% 408 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 62%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.55
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
88.6% Excellent
Lighting 103
Reflection 145
Parallax 136
84% 128 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 136
Splatting 111
98% 120 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vo0300ec HPN 300GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4PC1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 151 143 76 44 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 122
Write 186
Mixed 183
SusWrite 105
34% 149 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 32.6
4K Mixed 21.8
73% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 69.1
DQ Mixed 64.4
58% 88.7 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 50%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
397GB free
Firmware: 05.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 35 34 35 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
41.4% Average
Read 110
Write 35
Mixed 43.2
SusWrite 34.9
41% 55.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 76%
Seagate ST4000LM024-2AN17V 4TB
1GB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 81.9
Write 19.4
Mixed 24.1
31% 41.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
51% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 63%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
418GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 34 35 35 36 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 120
Write 37
Mixed 45.2
SusWrite 35.1
44% 59.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
47% Average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 17
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 12
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 81.1
49% 81.1 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 47%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair V Formula Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair V Formula - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $680
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback