HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics41.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory192GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 192GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory91.5 GB free of 192.002 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100913
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 26 '20 at 22:07
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5520
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
42.2% Average
Memory 75.2
1-Core 51.6
2-Core 57.6
43% 61.5 Pts
4-Core 58.1
8-Core 53.4
8% 55.8 Pts
64-Core 48.6
3% 48.6 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1288 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.9.1
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.1% Average
Lighting 44.1
Reflection 39.4
Parallax 84.9
36% 56.1 fps
MRender 67.4
Gravity 67.6
Splatting 55
51% 63.3 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Edge Boost Pro Plus 7mm 240GB
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 507ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 102 118 142 150 153 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.8% Average
Read 214
Write 198
Mixed 210
SusWrite 124
42% 187 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 33.6
4K Mixed 25
83% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 96.2
DQ Write 77.7
DQ Mixed 81.8
63% 85.2 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 73%
WD WD1600HLFS-60G6U2 160GB
138GB free
Firmware: 04.04V05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 87 100 105 110 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 114
Write 109
Mixed 74
SusWrite 97.1
73% 98.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.4
245% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 68%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
927GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3T0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 90 107 108 114 116 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
68.2% Good
Read 137
Write 132
Mixed 30.3
SusWrite 101
72% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
125% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 75%
WD WD15NPVX-00EA4T0 1.5TB
1TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 70 77 84 84 85 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 86.3
Write 82.4
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 75.8
54% 73.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT42GR7BMR4C-G7 ID:80 AD HMT42GR7BMR4C-G7 ID:80 AD HMT42GR7BMR4C-G7 ID:80 AD HMT42GR7BMR4C-G7 ID:80 AD HMT42GR7BMR4C-G7 ID:80 AD HMT42GR7BMR4C-G7 ID:80 AD HMT42GR7BMR4C-G7 ID:80 AD H... 226GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 34816 MB
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
24.1% Poor
MC Read 5.7
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 8.9
21% 7.47 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 9.7
24% 8.27 GB/s
Latency 89.9
44% 89.9 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,953 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback