Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics27.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive147% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Default string
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7  (all builds)
Memory22.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170220
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 08 '17 at 04:05
Run Duration237 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
84% Excellent
Memory 76.9
1-Core 123
2-Core 244
81% 148 Pts
4-Core 489
8-Core 884
82% 686 Pts
64-Core 1,348
83% 1,348 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 84%
Great: 81%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gigabyte(1458 3667) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 381.65
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Lighting 23.2
Reflection 17.5
Parallax 20.7
19% 20.5 fps
MRender 25.7
Gravity 23.9
Splatting 17.3
18% 22.3 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 19%
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Gigabyte(1458 3643) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 381.65
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Lighting 31.7
Reflection 29.2
Parallax 36.4
26% 32.4 fps
MRender 39.5
Gravity 38
Splatting 32.3
30% 36.6 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$251
180GB free
Firmware: DXT09B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Read 507
Write 249
Mixed 253
74% 336 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 74.3
4K Mixed 12
96% 37.8 MB/s
DQ Read 197
DQ Write 203
DQ Mixed 29.9
69% 143 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 85%
Corsair Force MP500 NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB-$43
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E7FM02.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
147% Outstanding
Read 2,197
Write 238
Mixed 400
201% 945 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 81.3
4K Mixed 31.9
130% 47.8 MB/s
DQ Read 30.2
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 68.5
63% 91.7 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 147%
Great: 210%
OCZ Vertex 3 MAX IOPS 240GB-$160
18GB free
Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
80% Very good
Read 518
Write 279
Mixed 346
84% 381 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 81.2
4K Mixed 18.9
112% 43.3 MB/s
DQ Read 226
DQ Write 201
DQ Mixed 65.8
90% 164 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 80%
Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Read 161
Write 142
Mixed 174
120% 159 MB/s
4K Read 0.78
4K Write 1.59
4K Mixed 0.18
82% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
385GB free
Firmware: CC82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
74% Very good
Read 164
Write 93.9
Mixed 133
98% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.88
4K Write 1.03
4K Mixed 0.22
80% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 74%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3333C DDR4 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1467 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
99.8% Outstanding
MC Read 39.4
MC Write 36
MC Mixed 34
104% 36.5 GB/s
SC Read 22.9
SC Write 38.2
SC Mixed 27.9
85% 29.7 GB/s
Latency 86.5
46% 86.5 ns
Poor: 92%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $826
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback