GPD G1619-01

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics9.22% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive219% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGPD G1619-01  (all builds)
MotherboardGPD G1619-01
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display800 x 1280 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200831
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateSep 13 '20 at 10:12
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1035G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 60.7
1-Core 97.8
2-Core 256
71% 138 Pts
4-Core 443
8-Core 610
66% 526 Pts
64-Core 611
38% 611 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus G7
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8691
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
9.22% Terrible
Lighting 17.1
Reflection 16.7
Parallax 16.6
14% 16.8 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.22%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Biwin SSD 512GB
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HYA1S7MB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 775 469 464 479 480 482 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
219% Outstanding
Read 1,550
Write 1,409
Mixed 101
SusWrite 525
198% 896 MB/s
4K Read 60.3
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 79.6
265% 91.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,026
DQ Write 880
DQ Mixed 359
431% 755 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 219%
Great: 251%
Generic MassStorageClass 64GB
58GB free, PID 0764
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 3.6 4.5 4.3 4.5 3.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 80.3
Write 6.5
Mixed 5.7
SusWrite 4.2
20% 24.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.6
48% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 3733 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
119% Outstanding
MC Read 47.2
MC Write 50.6
MC Mixed 40.6
132% 46.1 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 38.3
SC Mixed 26.9
79% 27.7 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 119%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G1619-01 Builds (Compare 54 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: GPD G1619-01

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback