Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics92.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory46.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200701
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateSep 04 '20 at 18:17
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Memory 76.7
1-Core 142
2-Core 282
90% 167 Pts
4-Core 567
8-Core 1,094
99% 831 Pts
64-Core 2,040
126% 2,040 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$288
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
92.3% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 118
Parallax 108
97% 115 fps
MRender 138
Gravity 97
Splatting 83
84% 106 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
477GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 440 441 335 298 328 282 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 447
Mixed 385
SusWrite 354
94% 420 MB/s
4K Read 37.9
4K Write 78.8
4K Mixed 49.6
163% 55.4 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 171
137% 192 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 101%
Great: 126%
Jmicron H/W JBOD 2TB
871GB free
Firmware: 32201020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 452 440 451 450 451 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 468
Write 444
Mixed 368
SusWrite 448
97% 432 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 87.4
4K Mixed 53
175% 60.2 MB/s
DQ Read 47.2
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 64.4
56% 80.1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 105%
Great: 105%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$120
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 69 69 69 68 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 91.2
Write 77.7
Mixed 52.4
SusWrite 68.3
53% 72.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
184% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 87%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
774GB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 116 114 117 116 117 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
65% Good
Read 110
Write 78.9
Mixed 74.7
SusWrite 116
70% 95 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 65%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3600C18-32GVK 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 47
MC Write 38.5
MC Mixed 40.5
120% 42 GB/s
SC Read 25
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 34.3
82% 28.7 GB/s
Latency 86.8
46% 86.8 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 112%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,020 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $178

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,011
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback